题目：
The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City's local newspaper.
"In our region of Trillura， the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend—the city-run public schools—comes from taxes that each city government collects. The region's cities differ， however， in the budgetary priority they give to public education. For example， both as a proportion of its overall tax revenues and in absolute terms， Parson City has recently spent almost twice as much per year as Blue City has for its public schools—even though both cities have about the same number of residents. Clearly， Parson City residents place a higher value on providing a good education in public schools than Blue City residents do."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻译：
在我们t地区，政府用于公立学校教育的开支大部分都是从各地市政府征收的税收而来的。然而，依据总体税收比率及相关政策来看，该地区不同城市对于公立教育的重视程度是不同的。例如，p城市用于公立学校的预算是b市的2倍，尽管两个城市居民的数量基本相同。所以，p城市百姓显然比b市居民更加关注公立教育。
写一篇回应，讨论还需要何种具体的证据才能更好的评估上面的论证，并解释这个证据是如何强化/削弱这篇文章的论证的。
感谢您阅读《argument31 》一文，留学群(liuxuequn.com)编辑部希望本文能帮助到您。